
I'm in so much pain right now. Its purely physical too. I went outside to put out the washing this morning, and I sneezed, then my back totally crushed itself. So i went to the chiropractor, who i have never had to go see in my life because i am usually of tip top health. We discussed the atrocity that is Julie going into the final of Masterchef, which is like the most unfair television decision ever, even though I despised Chris. But now apparently, i have weak back ligaments, due to: being lefthanded, eating to much sugar, not eating enough fish oils and multi vitamins.
IM IN SO MUCH PAIN RIGHT NOW. All I can do is try and sit comfortably, with a lap top on my lap. I have the tv turned on, and I would very much like to watch some Veronica Mars, but thats means movement, so right now im stuck watching a show about angry rabbits on the Disney Channel, because my damn brother chooses to watch this, and changing the channel means moving upstairs.
But at least the upside to this has been: Richard Gasquet!
Go MAAAAAAN! Killed two birds with one stone, Reeeeeeshar!
But I must admit, reading
this document made me suffer from excruciating second hand embarassment.
Because things like this:

and this:

is information you dont ever really want to share with anybody. Poor boy. Forever he will be known for this, instead of his majestic backhand.
Okay, and what im not understanding is the backlash against Gasquet. Today The Age wrote an article comparing Shane Warne's 2003 suspension to Richard's two and a half month suspension, calling it unfair. All other media articles seem to be in disbelief over the small suspension too. But what I dont understand is, well yeah, a kiss may be an unbelievable excuse, but what if the person in question was tested and found to have a whole line's worth in their body? This person would get the maximum penalty of a two year suspension, yes? So does a player who is found to have "a grain of salt's worth" in their body deserve to receive two, or even one, year? Obviously, by only finding such a tiny amount contaminating the body, it surely cant mean that the offender purposefully took the drugs? It would have been ridiculous and unfair to be sentencing anyone for over a year, especially to a non-performance enhanding drug.